.
Feedback

NRA to Make Announcement Friday; What Do You Want to Hear From Them?

Gun lobbying group issues statement about preventing future tragedies after shooting in Connecticut.

After days of silence, the National Rifle Association has released a statement on the tragic shooting in Newtown, CT, saying it will make "meaningful contributions to help make sure this never happens again" and pledged to make an announcement on Friday.

In the release, the organization begins to explain its silence, saying: "Out of respect for the families, and as a matter of common decency, we have given time for mourning, prayer and a full investigation of the facts before commenting."The organization announced it will hold a press conference Friday in Washington, D.C.

More details on Friday's press conference will be released when timing is deemed "appropriate," according to the statement.

In the interim, we want to know, what do you hope the NRA does in response to the Newtown tragedy?

George W December 20, 2012 at 06:45 pm
It is tragic what happened in CT, but The NRA shouldn’t have to say a thing. Blaming the NRA for shootings is like blaming AAA for drunk driving.
Lorraine DeVita December 20, 2012 at 09:13 pm
Everyone can do MORE including the NRA to solve the issues at hand with firearms
The NRA, the firearms manufacturers the ammo manufacturers, the gun owners, the polticians, th the lobbyists, the general population. I dare say there are more who DONT own guns than those that do. Perhaps a general population VOTE where the majority of citizens decided if the Second amendment should be revised or even abolished is a way to go if it is even legaly feasible to do so.This takes it out of washingtons hands and lays it at the feet of the general public to decide. in light of the recent Tragedies it would be intersting to see what the outcome would be if the american people had the right to decide. Neither the NRA nor manufacturers should have a voice in US Policy and law. either directly or behind closed doors . While we elect people to represent us I am sure some are slightly prone to viewpoints that are financial and campaign driven. The deeper the pockets of lobbies the more politicians are apt to side with them. Bring it to a vote of the american people. Let the VOTERS decide directly.
scott December 21, 2012 at 01:15 pm
No body in there right mind needs to have an assault rifle in there house. A hand gun or rifle yes, no person other than law enforcement or military should have high capacity weapons and ammo clips.....
Lorraine DeVita December 21, 2012 at 07:13 pm
Well according to the NRA announcement we need ARMED GUARDs for the schools. Now doesnt that make sense. Why not a tank or a few well placed cannons or missles too? Are they SERIOUS? How about having the NRA PAY for bullet proof glass in all schools. pay for security alarms and door buzzers and bullet proof doors on all classrooms. I am sure any of the security firms that design corporate & financial security systems could come up with a solution OTHER then ARMED guards all on the NRA , its members dime and the billion dollar gun manufacturers dime
George W December 21, 2012 at 09:14 pm
Because most people are naive and believe everything the media tells them (yeah like there is no agenda there), assault rifles are illegal for most to own (see below for ownership laws). An AR-15 is NOT an assault rifle. Another thing that most people are not aware of is that the AR-15 is not a high power rifle. It is not much different than a small caliber 22.
George W December 21, 2012 at 09:14 pm
For those of you who need an education here is the true definition of what an assault rifle is:
An assault rifle is a select-fire (either fully automatic or burst capable) rifle that uses an intermediate cartridge and a detachable magazine. It is not to be confused with assault weapons.[1] Assault rifles are the standard service rifles in most modern armies. Assault rifles are categorized in between light machine guns, which are intended more for sustained automatic fire in a light support role, and submachine guns, which fire a pistol cartridge rather than a rifle cartridge. • It must be an individual weapon with provision to fire from the shoulder (i.e. a buttstock); • It must be capable of selective fire; • It must have an intermediate-power cartridge: more power than a pistol but less than a standard rifle or battle rifle; • Its ammunition must be supplied from a detachable magazine rather than a feed-belt. • And it should at least have a firing range of 300 meters (1000 feet)
George W December 21, 2012 at 09:14 pm
Rifles that meet most of these criteria, but not all, are technically not assault rifles despite frequently being considered as such. For example, semi-automatic-only rifles like the AR-15 (which the M16 rifle is based on) that share designs with assault rifles are not assault rifles, as they are not capable of switching to automatic fire and thus are not selective fire capable. Belt-fed weapons or rifles with fixed magazines are likewise not assault rifles because they do not have detachable box magazines.
Civilian ownership of assault rifles or any other full-automatic firearm is tightly regulated by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives under the National Firearms Act of 1934 as amended by Title II of the Gun Control Act of 1968. In addition, the Firearms Owners' Protection Act of 1986 halted the manufacture of assault rifles for the civilian market and currently limits legal civilian ownership to units produced and properly registered with the BATFE before May 1986. Some states have enacted laws against civilian possession of automatic weapons that override NFA clearance; Kansas, on the other hand, repealed its own state law against civilian ownership of assault rifles in July 2008.[24] Civilians may purchase semi-automatic versions of such firearms without requiring NFA clearance, although some states (including California and New Jersey) enforce their own restrictions and/or prohibitions on such weapons.
Lorraine DeVita December 21, 2012 at 09:41 pm
Can i ask a naive question WHY do some need more guns then they have hands to hold them? Is having an arsonal of weapons and ammo a sign of sick mind or mind that is preoccupied on what exactly? If you like to collect firearms do so withOUT having the capacity to be fired. These arent TOYS or stuffed animals . They are weapons the sole purpose of which is to shoot something or someone.
Lorraine DeVita December 21, 2012 at 09:53 pm
May i remind all of you gun toting individuals of the shoot out here in seaford where a trained and licensed gun owner a former poice officer shot and killed another law officer because he could not in the adrenilin packed heat of the moment ascertain who was the good guy with the gun and who was the bad guy with a fake gun> SO all these MACHO gun owners who feel they will rise to the occassion and shoot the bad guy feel they could have handled th situation any better. one mans life was lost another mans life is destoryed and another the criminal is behind bars . The winner here was WHO exactly?? what was accomplished> GUNS kill because the people even trained expereinced people who own them USE them.
George W December 21, 2012 at 10:02 pm
simple and quick answer. Guns come in all shapes, sizes and caliber, each with their own purpose. Its kind of like saying why does a golfer need so many different clubs or a fisherman why do they need different kinds of fishing rods or lures. In hunting, you would not use the same gun to shoot a bear or moose as you would a rabbit or duck. Same ideology goes for spot/target shooting. Wheit comes to something like home defense, you would want something small and compact where it is less cumbersome (like a handgun or short rifle). Im not trying to come off like some hard core gun nut (and no, I am not a member of the NRA). Yes I own a few, but the main reason why im posting is more to inform and educate.
In the middle of the night, if someone happens to break into y our home, what line of defense do you have? The first thing your going to do is call for a person with a gun, but you never know how long it is going to take for that person (the police) to get to you? a few minutes? It only takes seconds for a home invader to get to you. Im not encouraging anyone to have a shoot out like its the wild west, but to sit vigil and prepare yourself if they try to get to you.
George W December 21, 2012 at 10:19 pm
This goes beyond citizens owning guns. Politicians want to strip us of our civil liberties. If we back down on this where does it stop? The reason why we are here today is because brave men and women with guns stood up and fought against the British.
Its unfortunate that guns do fine their way into the hands of people that are intent on hurting others, but how is that any different than a drunk person getting behind a wheel of a car and killing people? Do we ban alcohol? Do we ban cars? We have super muscle cars with hundreds of horse power and exceed speeds way over 100 mph, yet our speed limits are only 55 (on average) for highways. Do we ban cars that go that fast? After all "speed kills"? As a society, where do we draw the line?
George W December 21, 2012 at 10:21 pm
(automobile deaths far surpass the number of deaths caused by firearms)

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Wantagh-Seaford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something