.
Feedback

Wantagh School District Cancels February Vacation Due to Sandy

Students will be in classes the week of Feb. 18-22 to make up for days missed by superstorm.

Students in the Wantagh School District will not have a February vacation this year as a result of missed days from Superstorm Sandy and an early November nor'easter. 

Wantagh Acting Superintendent of Schools Maureen Goldberg sent a message to parents late Tuesday morning informing them of the calendar adjustment. In addition to having school during the previously scheduled February vacation holiday break from Feb. 18-22, students will also have classes now on March 15 and April 1, which were originally slated to superintendent conference days. The district was forced to close schools for six days a result of Superstorm Sandy as well as on Nov. 8 due to a nor’easter.

“Although at this time the Spring break has been preserved, should further days be required due to any upcoming inclement weather, this vacation time may need to be abbreviated as well,” Goldberg said in her message to parents Tuesday. “Let's all hope for a warm winter.”

Seaford school officials could not immediately be reached for comment on the district’s status with making up six lost days from Sandy and the nor’easter. Districts across Long Island have inquired with the New York State Department of Education about waiving the requirement of having at least 180 days of instructional time due to Sandy, but no decision has yet been made. 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Wantagh-Seaford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Chris Wendt November 27, 2012 at 08:32 pm
Good decision and timely execution. Well done, Dr. Goldberg.
Seaford Tax payers November 28, 2012 at 02:32 am
Wantagh has stood long with merrick-Jericho-Manhassat-Syosset- and MANY others now on putting EDUCATION first. Well Done.
Seaford where do you stand?? Were waiting.........................
victor arena November 28, 2012 at 05:02 am
I disagree. There is no reason to make a decision now.The extra days are not needed. They should appeal to the govenor.The students don't need to be in school exactly 180 days, it's just a made up number that the state came up with. It can be changed.Now there are 6 months of school with only one break for the students.The winter break is an important week for families. Give back the conference days and leave it at that.
old miller November 28, 2012 at 11:31 am
Appeal to the governor?!?!
Please feel free to cut and past, Victor. Dear Gov. Cuomo, Please help us. Our school district wants to, like, make sure that our kids get a full 180 days of education. They even canceled the fabricated February recess. You know, the fabricated break that should have been done away with a long time ago. Now, our children will be forced to learn for 2 straight months in a row without a break. Please do something. Intervene! Deploy the National Guard! Stop the insanity! PS I also demand that you do something about our astronomical taxes and the exorbitant salaries that teachers are getting paid.
Robert Demarco November 28, 2012 at 01:17 pm
Somebody must have a vacation trip scheduled for that week.
Lorraine DeVita November 28, 2012 at 02:28 pm
We are awaiting as some have stated/alluded to in a previous article on whether or not REFUNDS for the Band trip in Feb to California will be available. In any event The decision will be made at the December 6th meeting. Should be interesting and lets hope thye make a educationaly sound decision that meets the educational needs of all the students in the district. BUT dont be surprised if the Spring break is cut short as well a few days here and there are eliminated. . We have unique PRIORITES in Seaford and Band is one of them and we seem to adjust and make our decisions and establish priorities to accomodate a few while stepping on educational the toes of many.
I HOPE i am wrong but we shall see!
ANTHONYS November 28, 2012 at 06:56 pm
As always in Seaford, The Band,The Football team and Cheer Leaders will decide what is done. People would rather have their kids play football or cheer then learn to read and write. Give them their "Red Cups" and they are happy. Also the BOE proably doesn't want to rock the boat before their condo vote.
Robert Demarco November 28, 2012 at 07:06 pm
When I used to attend board meetings in my district (not Seaford), parents always lobbied for sports and other extracurricular activites, and very rarely for academic issues. Sports and clubs are important for well rounded individuals, but the main purpose of the school district is to educate the children, and all decisions should be based on educational needs.
Lorraine DeVita November 28, 2012 at 09:18 pm
Well Robert, the way i see it prospective colleges and employers look FIRST at academics then if need be at community activites. SO in order to compete with the academic heaveyweights on the Island never mind across the country the someone should be paying more attention to education and less to being "well rounded". What do they think their prowess on the field is going to allow them ROLL OVER and superceed the academic requirements.? Its not as IF we have as Syosett does EVERY student athlete earning OVER a 90 grade point average. Not some, not a majority but EVERY SINGLE STUDENT ATHLETE IN SYOSETT HAS OVER A 90 grade point average. Ya think maybe sports are second and academics come first in some schools districts?
old miller November 29, 2012 at 12:36 am
For the most part, I agree with you. Students on the North Shore often prioritize academics over everything else. But, not all that shines is gold, Lorraine.
I can tell you, from first-hand experience, that there is also an enormous amount of pressure on teachers in Long Island's most prestigious districts to inflate grades... Dramatically in some cases.
BeeKay November 29, 2012 at 12:45 am
so very true Old Miller. I too know first hand from relatives that live and work in some of these top districts that sometimes (I will hold off on saying many times) these districts' administrators pressure the teachers to take whatever means necessary to have top grades and be the "top dog" among their competition. Basically, it's keeping up with the Jones's, but unfortunately it is not always played fair.
And I am not stereotyping all top districts, just agreeing with Old Miller that this certainly is the case at times.
Thomas Taxpayer November 29, 2012 at 01:06 am
I feel they don't want to rock the boat and upset all the band ,cheerleaders, and others before the vote to sell the old school. And as to has vacations scheduled trust me it is our protected elite educators- that's who.
I applaud Wantagh for putting kids back in school for eight make up days. They have their educational priorities in Order. This town does seem to have a "red cup" mentality. Anthony is correct.
BeeKay November 29, 2012 at 01:31 am
I'm sure the district will follow suit and use either the winter break and/or spring break to make up the missed days, but why the need to crucify Seaford as if they are the only district to not yet put forth a proposal. Approximately half the districts on LI have addressed the issue: http://www.newsday.com/long-island/education/many-li-students-won-t-get-midwinter-break-1.4259091?obref=obinsite
I'm sure most other districts will address the issue prior to, or during, their December BOE meetings. As is the case in Levittown, the plan is currently a "proposal" by the Supt. and is pending BOE approval: http://www.levittownschools.com/resources/parent/Calendar%20Revision%20Letter.pdf#page=1&view=FitH&navpanes=0 If Seaford's December BOE meeting (which I am sure will be attended by so many of the malcontents) comes and goes and the matter isn't addressed, then I could see the complaining/insulting. But for now, it is a bit premature.
Lorraine DeVita November 29, 2012 at 02:45 am
@BeeKay-This is where our differences begin YOU seem to be SATISIFED and in acceptance that we are doing fine and ok .. I on the other hand am NOT satisfied that we are doing our best for our students. We are NEVER EVER FIRST or LEADERS.or ground breakers ACADEMICALLY as a DISTRICT. I implore you to Cite 1 recent example where SEAFORD LEAD in ANYTHING academically as a DISTRICT. not by a small group but as a DISTRICT. I would then possibly conceed your points.
If you want to call me a malcontent then i wear that lable proudly because to be SATISIFIED with never being a LEADER Academically is a diservice to EVERY STUDENT that passes thru the doors of our schools. When you LOWER your expectations to settle when you deny the students the ability as a DISTRICt to be a leader others emulate then you fail. . DO the Jerichos of the world PUSH their teachers and students to cheat, i strongly doubt it, nor is it as rampant as you think most people have integrity. , i do however find that when we dont expect BETTER we are AS at fault as the ones who do cheat because we are CHEATING OUR STUDENTS by not giving them higher standards to aspire to and reach as a DISTRICT.
Lorraine DeVita November 29, 2012 at 02:47 am
I could fully understand if waiting or following or even procrastinating provided trend setting results. I can and do appreciate & see where caution in some cases needs to be taken. HOWEVER, here in Seaford it is complacency, not realizing that when you do not aspire to BE the best then you will never be AS successful as those who do. I have always stated our students are capable of so much more then we are giving them the opportunity to be. The only thing preventing this district from BEING an academic leader is complacency.
BeeKay November 29, 2012 at 03:15 am
Lorainne, why do I seem to be satisfied and in acceptance that we are doing fine and ok? And why do you think I was referring to you as a malcontent (I know you attend meetings, so obviously this wasn't directed to you). I am speaking of others who rant and spread rumors online, but fail to ever attend meetings or become involved with the district in any way, shape, or form. So to clarify, I wasn't speaking of you. And please don't ever think that I am satisfied with simply being "okay". But this seems to be your MO at times...get defensive and attack anyone whose opinion differs from yours. Your erratic responses often deflect from what are occasionally valid points. Level headed is the way to go....try it :-)
And in regard's to Old Miller's post, it certainly does exist in some of these top districts. I am not saying all, but it sure does exist. And Jericho isn't one of the ones I have any personal knowledge of.
BeeKay November 29, 2012 at 03:18 am
Looking back at my post, I can see where my sarcasm was lost:
"If Seaford's December BOE meeting (which I am sure will be attended by so many of the malcontents)..." I was speaking of the chronic complainers who never attend meetings
Lorraine DeVita November 29, 2012 at 03:54 am
Beekay- i was stating it APPEARS We have a disconnect on how we both perceive this district is doing academically. you appear to repeatedly defend the staus quo or appear to make excuses for them. i keep saying we can do better, and i insist they SHOULD do better.. this has been a running thread between us. I am not one for allowing complacency to rule the roost. As a district we ARE complacent.I have friends in Jericho some teach there, none of them would compromise their integrity nor would they allow their students to do so either . it is just an entirely different educational mind set. THEY push pull demand & cajole and imbed in their students you WILL succeed ! . I identify with this as i grew up in westchester in a public sd that had very rigorous and demanding standards academicaly. We were given every opportunity to be successful. I sent my kids to private Hs's because i personally felt that the academic standards we have here in Seaford did not reflect the ones i wanted for my kids. My choice my dollar. However things havent changed in 20 some odd years. We havent ADVANCED or EVOLVED we have remained the same. That to Me personally is the biggest DISSERVICE to our students. Our students deserve better and we should be demanding better FOR them. Thats MY opinion IF I have misinterpreted your intentions or postings then i am am truly sorry but they APPEAR to me to be PRO status quo. If i am wrong then again i am sorry.
Lorraine DeVita November 29, 2012 at 04:08 am
@beekay- I have stated wait until the board meeting- however My concern is not the time frame but rather the REASON. If this district is trying to placate or make academic choices based on band trips and refunds then i personally have a huge issue with that. The world does not revolve around refunds for a BANDs trip, nor cancellations for 200+ students.. IF that was the CASE then EVERY parent who has a trip planned during any vacation time should be allowed the same consideration in this districts planning of make up days.
Which is totaly ridiculous. Lets put it this way if 300 separate families had vacations planned during spring break does anyone actually think this administraiton or board or ANY rational Admin or Board would give them ANY consideration if they chose to make up the days during spring break vs winter break? of course not. So WHy should the board and Admin be dithering about a Band Trip and refunds. If this is truly the case then yes i question their judgement and priorities.
old miller November 29, 2012 at 01:53 pm
This is probably an exercise in futility, but I will give it a shot nonetheless, Lorraine.
A school district's priorities, in practice not in writing, are a reflection of the values held by the community that it serves. If you do not like Seaford's apparent tendency to place sports and activities above academics, you only have your neighbors to blame. We have the same issues in Wantagh, as well as much of the districts on the South Shore. Parents yearn for the immediate gratification of seeing their child's name in lights rather than appreciating the sacrifices that need to be made for success in the long term. Conversely, the children on the North Shore, for the most part, have been conditioned to fight for the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow, which, of course, brings its own baggage for kids to manage. And that leads, irrefutably, to grade inflation. You may want to take a moment to reflect before you begin slamming away at your poor, poor keyboard.
Lorraine DeVita November 29, 2012 at 02:51 pm
I fully agree with you. Our children, OUR schools ARE the product and reflection of our values. HOWEVER, there are growing numbers who firmly believe that we need not compromise our childrens futures and a chnge of priorites is needed. We must change OUR attitude on what is educationaly acceptable while RETAINING what makes us unique and separate from most other communities-
We are FAMILY oriented , We are Community oriented , we are for the most part compassionate neighbors who strive to help each other regardless of our own circumstances. This has been most evident in the aftermath of Sandy. We need as parents, taxpayers and as communities to grasp the concept that we need to combine What makes US special and unique and wonderful with a stronger focus on EDUCATION. I came from a NS mentality "waspy" "tony"" priviledged" community in Westchester. What I took away was the top notch education the rest i happily left behind - Much to the chagrin of my parents(understatement) . Affluence & success are not JUST synonomous with geography .Its a Mind set However if we combine the BEST of both, Family and community values we hold dear and incorporate the higher education values of others, establish new" traditions" that support both then there would be limitless possibilities for our students , they would then have the ability to SOAR . What parent wouldn't want that for their child?
Lorraine DeVita November 29, 2012 at 02:55 pm
You dont sacrifice education for feel good moments nor should you obliterate those "traditions' that make us special. We need balance, a clearer perspective on whats MOST important, a shift in priorities to place education at the TOP of the list empowering our students to succeed while embrassing all the values that make us special and unique.
Lorraine DeVita November 29, 2012 at 03:12 pm
ps i dont slam - i hunt and peck.
VoReason November 30, 2012 at 02:37 am
I'm not going to comment on the missed days because I am completely confident that all missed days will be made up and I don't mind waiting until December 6th to hear a decision on an issue affecting class days in February. However, I am confused Loraine. You state that we are never number one academically, but we don't financially support our academic programs like other districts that routinely top the charts do. I am not saying we short change our kids, because I know seaford taxpayers are shouldering a heavy tax burden, but the Jerichos and syossets and garden city's are all spending way more per student and they aren't operating under the constant threat of a failed budget, which prevents a board and administrative team from proposing any kind of plans that might stimulate academic growth but come at a steep financial cost. You can't simultaneously call for decreased spending but increased performance. That just isn't a fair expectation.
Chris Wendt November 30, 2012 at 11:45 am
Re: "You can't simultaneously call for decreased spending but increased performance. That just isn't a fair expectation."
But wait...there's more! (Paraphrasing) "Spend less, teach more and teach better, but do not sell that decrepit hulk of a school on Seaford Avenue. Do not get your hands dirty by touching that $5 million sale price; walk, no run away fast from that $500K annual tax revenue from the proposed development; and, let's keep on spending that spare $100K to insure it and maintain it every year, while we keep on cutting Middle School sports to make up for the lost $400K rental income since BOCES bailed-out." And the coup de grace: "Vote to not change anything!"
Sal Triolo November 30, 2012 at 12:18 pm
You nailed it Chris. You perfectly summarized and exposed the rantings of someone who cannot follow a cogent or logical argument.
Lorraine DeVita November 30, 2012 at 01:19 pm
VoReason,
Well then i suspect that MANY companies across the GLOBE that DO and are currently subscribing to the " spend less and increase performance" probably arent going to succeed either. SHAME on EVERY business model, shame on every CEO, shame on every STOCK HOLDER out there then, for you and Chris and Sal obviously dont quite grasp or subscribe to this current methodology .. Might want to talk to your bosses about this to see where you stand in the scheme of things. .. lmao
Lorraine DeVita November 30, 2012 at 01:25 pm
@ SAL/Chris . Cut spending increase perfomance - seems to be the business model for most EVERY company on the planet.. So we should be exempt from such proven successful business models because neither of you can grasp the concept? go talk to your boss or your CEO.CIO CFO maybe they can explain it to you.Rather simple and effective concept - DO MORE with less.. ITs called surving the economy -
VoReason November 30, 2012 at 09:03 pm
Lorraine, I think that is a tragic flaw. In my opinion..and I'm no expert...the private sector business model of cost cutting to do more with less cannot be applied to a public school system. We're.not talking about wealth management or production of a product, we're talking about educating a population with evolving socioeconomic factors and an ever-increasing dependency on technology. The same quantitative analysis that drives business models just doesn't apply. Being an expert at running a business does NOT make you qualified to run a school district, government, etc.
VoReason November 30, 2012 at 09:08 pm
I would also be curious to see proof of any successful school district that has seen increases in performance simultaneous to decreases in funding. I just can't believe that can happen.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something